Two real-world scenarios for EE-UQ and quoFEM
- silviamazzoni
- Mar 11
- 3 min read
I now wanted to learn how they are used, this may help me understand them better....
Awesome! Let's go through two real-world scenarios where EE-UQ and quoFEM would be used.
🛠 Scenario 1: Using EE-UQ (Earthquake Engineering with UQ)
Problem: Evaluating Seismic Response of a 5-Story Concrete Building
You are an earthquake engineer assessing a 5-story reinforced concrete building located in Los Angeles. Your goal is to estimate how much the building will shake when subjected to a strong earthquake and understand the impact of material uncertainties (e.g., variations in concrete strength).
Steps in EE-UQ:
Define the Structural Model
You create a finite element model (FEM) of the building using OpenSees or another supported software.
The model includes columns, beams, slabs, and connections with assigned material properties.
Select Earthquake Ground Motions
You import real earthquake records from a database (e.g., from PEER NGA-West2).
You apply multiple ground motion time histories to the model.
Incorporate Uncertainty
You define random variables for uncertain properties, such as:
Concrete compressive strength (e.g., normally distributed around 4000 psi).
Steel yield strength.
Damping ratio.
The software will run multiple simulations with different material properties to see how the variations affect the response.
Run Simulations & Analyze Results
EE-UQ runs many simulations (Monte Carlo or Latin Hypercube Sampling) to explore different earthquake scenarios.
You review results like:
Maximum displacement at the roof.
Story drift ratio (how much each floor moves relative to the one below).
Base shear forces.
What You Learn from EE-UQ:
How much uncertainty in material properties affects building performance.
The expected range of displacements and forces during earthquakes.
Whether the building meets seismic safety standards or needs retrofitting.
🛠 Scenario 2: Using quoFEM (General UQ & Optimization for FEM)
Problem: Optimizing the Design of a Steel Beam
You are a structural engineer designing a steel beam for a high-rise building. Your goal is to find the best combination of beam depth and flange width that minimizes weight while ensuring adequate strength and reliability under load.
Steps in quoFEM:
Create a Finite Element Model
You build a simple beam model in ABAQUS or OpenSees.
The beam is subject to a uniformly distributed load.
Define Random Variables & Uncertainty
Material properties (yield strength, modulus of elasticity).
Load variations (e.g., wind and live loads).
Manufacturing tolerances (beam depth and flange width).
Set Up Optimization Criteria
Objective: Minimize beam weight
Constraints:
Maximum allowable stress (≤ 250 MPa).
Maximum deflection (≤ L/360, where L is beam span).
Run Sensitivity & Reliability Analysis
Sensitivity analysis identifies which parameters most affect performance.
Bayesian calibration adjusts the model using real-world experimental data.
Reliability analysis ensures the design meets safety standards with a high probability.
Get Optimized Beam Design
quoFEM suggests the optimal beam dimensions balancing weight, cost, and performance.
You adjust the final design based on reliability insights.
What You Learn from quoFEM:
The best beam design that minimizes weight while meeting safety constraints.
Which parameters (material properties, loads, dimensions) are most important for performance.
How likely the beam is to fail under extreme loads.
🔍 Quick Summary of the Two Scenarios
Feature | EE-UQ (Earthquake Response) | quoFEM (Optimization & Reliability) |
Example Problem | How will a 5-story building respond to an earthquake? | What’s the best steel beam design for weight & safety? |
Type of Analysis | Structural response to earthquakes | General-purpose optimization & uncertainty analysis |
Key Input | Ground motion records & material uncertainties | Material properties, loads, geometry uncertainties |
Main Output | Displacement, forces, drift under earthquakes | Optimal beam dimensions, reliability metrics |
Use Case | Earthquake engineers, seismic performance assessment | Structural optimization, reliability analysis |
🚀 Final Takeaway
Use EE-UQ when you want to analyze how earthquakes affect a structure, incorporating ground motion records and material uncertainties.
Use quoFEM when you need uncertainty quantification, optimization, or reliability analysis for any general finite element problem, not necessarily earthquake-related.
Would you like a step-by-step guide on running one of these simulations? 😊
Of course I said YES!!! But I'll put that in the next post... just to keep things organized!
Comments