top of page

You've Generated the Data—Now What? Storing It Efficiently by Design

silviamazzoni

Generating data is easy—creating vast amounts of it is even easier. The real challenge lies in deciding how to store it effectively. Choosing the right storage solution involves multiple factors, and here are my (and ChatGPT's) top recommendations.



🔹 TL;DR - What Should You Consider?

What type of data do you have? (structured, unstructured, variable schema)

How will you access it? (random vs. sequential reads, querying needs)

How big is your dataset? (MBs, GBs, or TBs?)

Where will you store it? (local, cloud, distributed system)

How interoperable does it need to be? (Cross-language support, portability)

🔥 Choosing the right format depends on how you plan to use, query, and scale your data! 🚀





🔍 Key Considerations for Choosing a Data Storage Format

When deciding how to store your data, you need to consider multiple factors, including data structure, access patterns, scalability, performance, and interoperability.


1️⃣ Data Characteristics

Structured vs. Unstructured Data

  • Structured (Tabular data, CSVs, Databases) → Parquet, HDF5, SQL, CSV

  • Semi-structured (JSON, XML, BSON, Key-Value Data) → JSON, BSON, NoSQL, Parquet (with nested structures)

  • Unstructured (Images, Videos, Text, Binary Data) → File-based storage, Object Storage (S3, Blob Storage), HDF5 (for large numerical arrays)

Schema Flexibility

  • Fixed Schema (same columns in every file) → Parquet, SQL, HDF5

  • Variable Schema (different fields in different files) → JSON, BSON, NoSQL (MongoDB)

2️⃣ Performance Considerations

Read/Write Speed

  • Frequent random reads/writes → NoSQL, Indexed SQL, HDF5

  • Fast sequential reads → Parquet, ORC, Arrow

  • Batch processing → Parquet, Avro, HDF5

Compression & Storage Efficiency

  • Highly compressed, columnar → Parquet, ORC (best for analytics)

  • Efficient for large numerical data → HDF5, Zarr

  • Compact, binary format → Avro, BSON

Queryability

  • SQL-like structured queries → SQLite, PostgreSQL, Parquet (via SQL engines like DuckDB/Spark)

  • Flexible NoSQL querying → MongoDB (BSON), Elasticsearch (JSON), Firebase

  • File-based querying → Parquet, ORC (optimized for columnar queries)

3️⃣ Scalability & Storage Size

Small vs. Large Datasets

  • Small dataset (~<1GB) → CSV, SQLite, JSON, Pickle

  • Medium dataset (~1GB - 100GB) → Parquet, SQLite, HDF5, MongoDB

  • Large dataset (>100GB - TBs) → Parquet (distributed), HDF5 (scientific data), SQL (indexed databases), NoSQL (MongoDB, Cassandra)

Cloud & Distributed Storage

  • Cloud-friendly & parallel access → Parquet (S3, GCS), Avro, Zarr (for cloud-based analytics)

  • Distributed databases → BigQuery, Snowflake, Spark with Parquet, Cassandra, DynamoDB

4️⃣ Interoperability & Compatibility

Who or What Will Access the Data?

  • Machine Learning / Data Science → Parquet, HDF5, Pandas-friendly formats (Feather, Arrow)

  • Web Applications → JSON (REST APIs), BSON (MongoDB), PostgreSQL

  • Big Data / Analytics → Parquet (Spark, Hive, DuckDB), ORC

  • Cross-language Compatibility → JSON, Parquet (supports Python, Java, C++)

📌 Final Decision Matrix

Factor

Best Format(s)

Tabular Data (CSV-like, structured)

Parquet, SQLite, HDF5

Variable Schema (JSON-like, flexible)

JSON, BSON, NoSQL (MongoDB, DynamoDB)

Fast Random Access (Indexed Queries)

SQL, NoSQL, HDF5

Large Data (Big Data Processing)

Parquet, ORC, Avro, Snowflake

Cloud/Distributed Storage

Parquet, Zarr, Avro, NoSQL (BigQuery, DynamoDB)

Binary Storage (Images, BLOBs, Large Objects)

HDF5, NoSQL (GridFS), Cloud Object Storage


Recent Posts

See All

Commenti


© 2020 by Silvia Mazzoni, Silvia's Brainery, Santa Monica, CA

bottom of page